Article info
PDFCommentary
Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective
- Correspondence to Dr Molly J Crockett, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; molly.crockett{at}ucl.ac.uk
Citation
Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective
Publication history
- Received November 30, 2012
- Accepted December 13, 2012
- First published January 25, 2013.
Online issue publication
May 19, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 January 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Other content recommended for you
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Are we unfit for the future
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival - at - any - cost bias
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Moral bioenhancement, freedom and reasoning
- Freedom and moral enhancement
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement