Article info
PDFFeature article
Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Correspondence to Dr David DeGrazia; ddd{at}gwu.edu
Citation
Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
Publication history
- Received May 9, 2012
- Revised September 12, 2012
- Accepted September 16, 2012
- First published January 25, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Are we unfit for the future?
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Moral bioenhancement: a neuroscientific perspective
- Moral bioenhancement, freedom and reasoning