Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Too often, we as individuals do things that harm us, that seriously interfere with our being able to live in the way that we want. We eat food that makes us obese, that promotes diabetes, heart failure and other serious illness, while at the same time, we want to live long and healthy lives. Too many of us smoke cigarettes, even while acknowledging we wish we had never begun. We behave in ways that undercut our ability to reach some of our most valued goals, despite education and despite incentives to choose the right thing. What should be done?
If I were to try to harm someone else in a way that alters his future seriously and perhaps irrevocably for the worse, I would be stopped. When it comes to hurting myself, though, we have a common belief that it is wrong to interfere, even if I foresee that I will very much regret what I have done, often when it is too late to fix what I have let happen. I think this makes no sense. If it is permissible, even obligatory, to stop me when I do something that seriously interferes with someone else's chances of achieving the life he wants, I think …
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Obesity, paternalism and fairness
- Paternalism, French fries and the weak-willed Witness
- Why lockdown of the elderly is not ageist and why levelling down equality is wrong
- The harm principle, personal identity and identity-relative paternalism
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Against Autonomy: response to critics
- Artificial gametes and the ethics of unwitting parenthood
- Businesses' voluntary pro-health tobacco policies: a review and research agenda
- Waiving legal rights in research
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?