Last year in June, British doctors went on strike for the first time since 1975. Amidst a global economic downturn and with many health systems struggling with reduced finances, around the world the issue of public health workers going on strike is a very real one. Almost all doctors will agree that we should always follow the law, but often the law is unclear or does not cover a particular case. Here we must appeal to ethical discussion. The General Medical Council, in its key guidance document for practising doctors, Good Medical Practice, claims that ‘Good doctors make the care of their patients their first concern’. Is this true? And if so, how is this relevant to the issue of striking? One year on since the events, we carefully reflect and argue whether it was right for doctors to pursue strike action, and call for greater discussion of ethical issues such as the recent strikes, particularly among younger members of the profession.
- Public Health Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What are the consequences when doctors strike?
- Impact of healthcare strikes on patient mortality: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
- A framework for assessing the ethics of doctors' strikes
- Should junior doctors strike?
- Going on strike
- Refusing to negotiate NHS pay is a false economy
- Junior doctors’ strike—what do medical students need to know?
- It’s time for serious dialogue, not playing politics
- Junior doctors’ strikes: BMA responds to your questions
- Junior doctors in England to strike for 72 hours from 13 March