Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Correspondence to Zohar Lederman, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, PO Box 208293, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8293, USA; zoharlederman{at}gmail.com
Citation
Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
Publication history
- Received April 3, 2012
- Revised February 21, 2013
- Accepted March 15, 2013
- First published April 4, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Patient-family agreement on values and preferences for life-sustaining treatment: results of a multicentre observational study
- Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment
- Family presence during resuscitation: extending ethical norms from paediatrics to adults
- The value of taking an ‘ethics history’
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey
- Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?