Whether to allow the presence of family members during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been a highly contentious topic in recent years. Even though a great deal of evidence and professional guidelines support the option of family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), many healthcare professionals still oppose it. One of the main arguments espoused by the latter is that family members should not be allowed for the sake of the patient's best interests, whether it is to increase his chances of survival, respect his privacy or leave his family with a last positive impression of him. In this paper, we examine the issue of FPDR from the patient's point of view. Since the patient requires CPR, he is invariably unconscious and therefore incompetent. We discuss the Autonomy Principle and the Three-Tiered process for surrogate decision making, as well as the Beneficence Principle and show that these are limited in providing us with an adequate tool for decision making in this particular case. Rather, we rely on a novel principle (or, rather, a novel specification of an existing principle) and a novel integrated model for surrogate decision making. We show that this model is more satisfactory in taking the patient's true wishes under consideration and encourages a joint decision making process by all parties involved.
- Applied and Professional Ethics
- Care of the Dying Patient
- Clinical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Patient-family agreement on values and preferences for life-sustaining treatment: results of a multicentre observational study
- Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment
- Family presence during resuscitation: extending ethical norms from paediatrics to adults
- The value of taking an ‘ethics history’
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey
- Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?