Comment on Levy's ‘Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
- Feature article
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Forced to be free? Increasing patient autonomy by constraining it
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- “They just don’t get it!” When family disagrees with expert opinion
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- An evaluative conservative case for biomedical enhancement
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- Medical maternalism: beyond paternalism and antipaternalism
- Public health for paediatricians:How can behavioural economics help to make paediatric practice more effective?
- Abortion and regret