Article info
PDFViewpoint
Differentiating between human and non-human interspecies embryos
- Correspondence to Calum MacKellar, Scottish Council on Human Bioethics, 15 Morningside Road, Edinburgh EH10 4DP, UK; Calum.MacKellar{at}schb.org.uk
Citation
Differentiating between human and non-human interspecies embryos
Publication history
- Received January 16, 2013
- Revised April 15, 2013
- Accepted April 29, 2013
- First published May 24, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Government backs down on merger of regulators but gives go-ahead to inter-species embryos
- What does the British public think about human–animal hybrid embryos?
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Scientists plead for right to create interspecies embryos
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- UK research community is to consult on use of animals containing human material
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?