Differentiating between human and non-human interspecies embryos
Following the debate in the UK House of Lords, in December 2012, uncertainty remains as to the manner in which human and non-human interspecies embryos are differentiated in law.
- Animal Experimentation
- Bills, Laws and Cases
- Embryos and Fetuses
- Moral Status
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Government backs down on merger of regulators but gives go-ahead to inter-species embryos
- What does the British public think about human–animal hybrid embryos?
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Scientists plead for right to create interspecies embryos
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- UK research community is to consult on use of animals containing human material
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?