Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques
- Correspondence to Dr David S Festinger, Section on Law and Ethics, Treatment Research Institute, 600 Public Ledger Building, 150 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA; dfestinger{at}tresearch.org
Citation
Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques
Publication history
- Received September 26, 2012
- Revised February 15, 2013
- Accepted March 12, 2013
- First published April 4, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Informed consent and participant perceptions of influenza vaccine trials in South Africa
- Does Waiver of Written Informed Consent from the Institutional Review Board Affect Response Rate in a Low-Risk Research Study?
- Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond
- Informed consent in Ghana: what do participants really understand?
- Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
- Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics
- Pre-post, mixed-methods feasibility study of the WorkingWell mobile support tool for individuals with serious mental illness in the USA: a pilot study protocol
- Trust and consent: a prospective study on parents’ perspective during a neonatal trial