Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Commentary
Moral concerns with sedation at the end of life
Citation
Moral concerns with sedation at the end of life
Publication history
- Received September 30, 2012
- Accepted October 10, 2012
- First published November 7, 2012.
Online issue publication
March 18, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 November 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia and palliative sedation in Belgium
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
- A response to critics: weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Ethics of crisis sedation: questions of performance and consent
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation
- Continuous palliative sedation in terminally ill patients with cancer: a retrospective observational cohort study from a Chinese palliative care unit
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”