Factors that facilitate or constrain the use of continuous sedation at the end of life by physicians and nurses in Belgium: results from a focus group study
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia and palliative sedation in Belgium
- Continuous palliative sedation until death: practice after introduction of the Dutch national guideline
- Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Dutch physicians on the role of the family in continuous sedation
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Estimating the potential life-shortening effect of continuous sedation until death: a comparison between two approaches
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Distress from voluntary refusal of food and fluids to hasten death: what is the role of continuous deep sedation?
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation