Continuous sedation at the end of life (CS) is the practice whereby a physician uses sedatives to reduce or take away a patient's consciousness until death. Although the incidence of CS is rising, as of yet little research has been conducted on how the administration of CS is experienced by medical practitioners. Existing research shows that many differences exist between medical practitioners regarding how and how often they perform CS. We conducted a focus group study to find out which factors may facilitate or constrain the use of continuous sedation by physicians and nurses. The participants often had clear ideas on what could affect the likelihood that sedation would be used. The physicians and nurses in the focus groups testified that the use of continuous sedation was facilitated in cases where a patient has a very limited life expectancy, suffers intensely, makes an explicit request and has family members who can cope with the stress that accompanies sedation. However, this ‘paradigm case’ was considered to occur only rarely. Furthermore, deviations from the paradigm case were said to be sometimes due to physicians initiating the discussion on CS too late or not initiating it at all for fear of inducing the patient. Deviations from the paradigm case may also occur when sedation proves to be too difficult for family members who are said to sometimes pressure the medical practitioners to increase dosages and speed up the sedation.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia and palliative sedation in Belgium
- Continuous palliative sedation until death: practice after introduction of the Dutch national guideline
- Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Dutch physicians on the role of the family in continuous sedation
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Estimating the potential life-shortening effect of continuous sedation until death: a comparison between two approaches
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Distress from voluntary refusal of food and fluids to hasten death: what is the role of continuous deep sedation?
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation