Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies
- Correspondence to Dr Robert Klitzman, Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY 10032, USA; rlk2{at}columbia.edu
Citation
How US institutional review boards decide when researchers need to translate studies
Publication history
- Received October 22, 2012
- Revised January 22, 2013
- Accepted January 30, 2013
- First published March 8, 2013.
Online issue publication
February 14, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 March 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence
- Variations in institutional review board processes and consent requirements for trauma research: an EAST multicenter survey
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
- ‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations