Article Text
Abstract
Misattributed paternity or ‘false’ paternity is when a man is wrongly thought, by himself and possibly by others, to be the biological father of a child. Nowadays, because of the progression of genetics and genomics the possibility of finding misattributed paternity during familial genetic testing has increased. In contrast to other medical information, which pertains primarily to individuals, information obtained by genetic testing and/or pedigree analysis necessarily has implications for other biologically related members in the family. Disclosing or not a misattributed paternity has a number of different biological and social consequences for the people involved. Such an issue presents important ethical and deontological challenges. The debate centres on whether or not to inform the family and, particularly, whom in the family, about the possibility that misattributed paternity might be discovered incidentally, and whether or not it is the duty of the healthcare professional (HCP) to disclose the results and to whom. In this paper, we consider the different perspectives and reported problems, and analyse their cultural, ethical and legal dimensions. We compare the position of HCPs from an Italian and British point of view, particularly their role in genetic counselling. We discuss whether the Oviedo Convention of the Council of Europe (1997) can be seen as a basis for enriching the debate.
- Genetic Counselling/Prenatal Diagnosis
- Genetic Information
- Truth Disclosure
- Minors/Parental Consent
- Legal Aspects
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Biobanks for non-clinical purposes and the new law on forensic biobanks: does the Italian context protect the rights of minors
- Medical maternalism: beyond paternalism and antipaternalism
- Examining the ethico - legal aspects of the right to refuse treatment in Turkey
- Ethics briefings
- Infectious health care workers: should patients be told
- Placebo treatments, informed consent and ‘ the grip of a false picture ’
- Relatives ' attitudes towards informing patients about the diagnosis of Alzheimer ’s disease
- Parsing placebo treatments: a response to Barnhill and Miller
- Ethical decision making in intensive care units: a burnout risk factor? Results from a multicentre study conducted with physicians and nurses
- Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling