Article info
Law, ethics and medicine
Paper
Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- Correspondence to Naser Aghababaei, Department of Clinical Psychology, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, POB 14155-8473, Iran; naseragha{at}gmail.com
Citation
Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
Publication history
- Received August 1, 2012
- Revised November 30, 2012
- Accepted January 1, 2013
- First published January 30, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Passive euthanasia
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- African vital force and the permissibility of euthanasia
- On acts, omissions and responsibility
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia