Disclosure ‘downunder’: misadventures in Australian genetic privacy law
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information
- Discovering misattributed paternity in genetic counselling: different ethical perspectives in two countries
- The right not to know: an autonomy based approach
- Challenges of genetic testing in adolescents with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes
- When to break the news and whose responsibility is it? A cross-sectional qualitative study of health professionals’ views regarding disclosure of BRCA genetic cancer risk
- Building on relationships of trust in biobank research
- Responding to complexity