Article info
PDFGenetics
Paper
Disclosure ‘downunder’: misadventures in Australian genetic privacy law
- Correspondence to Dr Wendy Bonython, School of Law, Faculty of Business, Government and Law, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; wendy.bonython{at}canberra.edu.au
Citation
Disclosure ‘downunder’: misadventures in Australian genetic privacy law
Publication history
- Received September 4, 2012
- Revised January 22, 2013
- Accepted February 19, 2013
- First published March 9, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives?
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- Medicolegal and insurance issues regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene tests in high income countries
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information
- Discovering misattributed paternity in genetic counselling: different ethical perspectives in two countries
- The right not to know: an autonomy based approach
- Challenges of genetic testing in adolescents with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes
- When to break the news and whose responsibility is it? A cross-sectional qualitative study of health professionals’ views regarding disclosure of BRCA genetic cancer risk
- Building on relationships of trust in biobank research