Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Commentary
Rationing, inefficiency and the role of clinicians
- Correspondence to Dr Kristin Voigt, McGill University, Institute for Health and Social Policy, 1130 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1A3, Canada; kristin.voigt{at}mcgill.ca
Citation
Rationing, inefficiency and the role of clinicians
Publication history
- Received February 12, 2013
- Revised October 8, 2013
- Accepted October 28, 2013
- First published November 29, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for ‘benchmarks of efficiency’
- “No decisions about us without us”? Individual healthcare rationing in a fiscal ice age
- Antimicrobial stewardship programmes: bedside rationing by another name?
- Assessing proposals to update established screening strategies
- Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
- Antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial stewardship programmes: benefiting the patient or the population?
- Assessing the value of human papillomavirus vaccination in Gavi-eligible low-income and middle-income countries
- Non-maleficence and the ethics of consent to cancer screening
- Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework
- Benefit–harm analysis of azithromycin for the prevention of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease