Article info
PDFResponses
The harms of prostitution: critiquing Moen's argument of no-harm
- Correspondence to Anna Westin, School of Theology, Philosophy and History, St. Mary's University College, Waldegrave Road, Strawberry Hill, London TW1 4SX, UK; canadianna{at}gmail.com
Citation
The harms of prostitution: critiquing Moen's argument of no-harm
Publication history
- Received September 16, 2012
- Revised April 11, 2013
- Accepted May 22, 2013
- First published June 12, 2013.
Online issue publication
January 21, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 June 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Is prostitution harmful?
- Prostitution and sexual ethics: a reply to Westin
- Prostitution, disability and prohibition
- Protection of sex workers
- Sexual rights and disability
- Sex work and HIV in Cambodia: trajectories of risk and disease in two cohorts of high-risk young women in Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Ethics of vaccine refusal
- A virtue ethics approach to moral dilemmas in medicine
- Does the rejection of wrongful life claims rely on a conceptual error?
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour