Article info
PDFCommentary
Prostitution and harm: a reply to Anderson and McDougall
- Correspondence to Dr Ole Martin Moen, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Box 1020 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, Norway; o.m.moen{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Prostitution and harm: a reply to Anderson and McDougall
Publication history
- Received March 18, 2013
- Accepted April 22, 2013
- First published May 22, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Is prostitution harmful?
- Prostitution, disability and prohibition
- The many faces of sex work
- Risk of HIV infection among male sex workers in Spain
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Sex in the city: sexual behaviour, societal change, and STDs in Saigon
- Impact of sex work on risk behaviours and their association with HIV positivity among people who inject drugs in Eastern Central Canada: cross-sectional results from an open cohort study
- Short term estimates of adult HIV incidence by mode of transmission: Kenya and Thailand as examples
- Counselling for connection: making queer relationships during Britain’s sexual revolution
- Characteristics of men who pay for sex: a UK sexual health clinic survey