Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
I agree with Scott A Anderson1 and Rosalind J McDougall2 that many prostitutes suffer significant harms, and that these harms must be taken seriously. Having a background in public outreach for sex workers, I share this concern wholeheartedly.
In the article to which Anderson and McDougall respond,3 I ask why prostitutes are harmed: are prostitutes harmed because prostitution itself is harmful or because of contingent ways in which prostitutes are socially and legally treated? This is an important question, since if the latter is the case, then the widespread moral and legal campaign against prostitution, rather than being a legitimate response to something harmful, is itself the source of much suffering and distress. In my article, I argue at length that it is indeed our social and legal treatment of prostitutes that is the dominant source of harm.
Neither Anderson nor McDougall seems to take issue with my rebuttal of (what I take to be) the nine most central arguments in favour of the view that prostitution itself is harmful. They do, however, raise a number of more general issues, and I shall now address these.
A worry raised by Anderson is that in defending the view that prostitution itself is not harmful, I am ‘abstracting away from key facts about the context in which prostitution takes place’, and as such, I ‘fail to recognize how contextual, historical and social’ prostitution really is. I think this is a good objection — so good, in fact, that I raise and discuss it in the article. I formulate the objection as follows:
[The objection] states that my argument is utopian: that prostitution is a complex practice deeply entrenched in a long line of other social and psychological issues, such as gender inequality, poverty, power hierarchies and exploitation, and that …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i For a thorough empirical overview published shortly after my article was written, see reference 4.
- Feature article
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is prostitution harmful?
- Prostitution, disability and prohibition
- The many faces of sex work
- Risk of HIV infection among male sex workers in Spain
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Sex in the city: sexual behaviour, societal change, and STDs in Saigon
- Impact of sex work on risk behaviours and their association with HIV positivity among people who inject drugs in Eastern Central Canada: cross-sectional results from an open cohort study
- Short term estimates of adult HIV incidence by mode of transmission: Kenya and Thailand as examples
- Counselling for connection: making queer relationships during Britain’s sexual revolution
- Characteristics of men who pay for sex: a UK sexual health clinic survey