Article Text
Commentary
Intrinsic versus contingent claims about the harmfulness of prostitution
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Responses
- Commentary
- Responses
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prevalence and correlates of exchanging sex for drugs or money among adolescents in the United States
- Estimates of the number of female sex workers in different regions of the world
- Globalisation, the sex industry, and health
- Prevalence of and risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection among STD clinic clientele in Miami, Florida
- Impact of sex work on risk behaviours and their association with HIV positivity among people who inject drugs in Eastern Central Canada: cross-sectional results from an open cohort study
- Is prostitution harmful?
- A network analysis of relationship dynamics in sexual dyads as correlates of HIV risk misperceptions among high-risk MSM
- Suboptimal plasma HIV-1 RNA suppression and adherence among sex workers who use illicit drugs in a Canadian setting: an observational cohort study
- A comparison of respondent-driven and venue-based sampling of female sex workers in Liuzhou, China
- Sex work in Tallinn, Estonia: the sociospatial penetration of sex work into society