Article Text
PDFCommentary
Intrinsic versus contingent claims about the harmfulness of prostitution
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Responses
- Commentary
- Responses
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prostitution and harm: a reply to Anderson and McDougall
- Is prostitution harmful
- Structural stigma, sex work and HIV: contradictions and lessons learnt from a community - led structural intervention in southern India
- The harms of prostitution: critiquing Moen 's argument of no - harm
- Protection of sex workers
- Quality of ethical guidelines and ethical content in clinical guidelines: the example of end - of - life decision - making
- Ethics by opinion poll? The functions of attitudes research for normative deliberations in medical ethics
- Sexual rights and disability
- Estimating the number of men who have sex with men in low and middle income countries
- Health of people experiencing co-occurring homelessness, imprisonment, substance use, sex work and / or severe mental illness in high - income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis