Article Text
Abstract
Background To determine (1) whether fetal care paediatric (FCP) and maternal–fetal medicine (MFM) specialists harbour differing attitudes about pregnancy termination for congenital fetal conditions, their perceived responsibilities to pregnant women and fetuses, and the fetus as a patient and (2) whether self-perceived primary responsibilities to fetuses and women and views about the fetus as a patient are associated with attitudes about clinical care.
Methods Mail survey of 434 MFM and FCP specialists (response rates 60.9% and 54.2%, respectively).
Results MFMs were more likely than FCPs to disagree with these statements (all p values<0.005): (1) ‘the presence of a fetal abnormality is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ (MFM : FCP—78.4% vs 63.5%); (2) ‘the effects that a child born with disabilities might have on marital and family relationships is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ (MFM : FCP—80.5% vs 70.2%); and (3) ‘the cost of healthcare for the future child is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ (MFM : FCP—73.5% vs 55.9%). 65% MFMs versus 47% FCPs disagreed that their professional responsibility is to focus primarily on fetal well-being (p<0.01). Specialists did not differ regarding the fetus as a separate patient. Responses about self-perceived responsibility to focus on fetal well-being were associated with clinical practice attitudes.
Conclusions Independent of demographic and sociopolitical characteristics, FCPs and MFMs possess divergent ethical sensitivities regarding pregnancy termination, pregnant women and fetuses, which may influence clinical care.
- Demographic Surveys/Attitudes
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Paediatrics
- Embryos and Fetuses
- Moral and Religious Aspects
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Attitudes of paediatric and obstetric specialists towards prenatal surgery for lethal and non-lethal conditions
- Delayed diagnosis and management of second trimester abdominal pregnancy
- Survey of physicians ' approach to severe fetal anomalies
- Abortion legislation, maternal healthcare, fertility, female literacy, sanitation, violence against women and maternal deaths: a natural experiment in 32 Mexican states
- Would you terminate a pregnancy affected by sickle cell disease? Analysis of views of patients in Cameroon
- Is there an ethical difference between preimplantation genetic diagnosis and abortion
- International retrospective cohort study of neural tube defects in relation to folic acid recommendations: are the recommendations working
- Prevalence and timing of pregnancy termination for brain malformations
- Prenatal diagnoses of sex chromosome conditions
- Decreasing prevalence of oral cleft live births in the Netherlands, 1997–2006