Article Text
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Response
On the relevance of an argument as regards the role of existential suffering in the end-of-life context
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Funding Academy of Finland (grant no. 137548).
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Law, ethics and medicine
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Medical expertise, existential suffering and ending life
- The debate about physician assistance in dying: 40 years of unrivalled progress in medical ethics?
- A simple solution to the puzzles of end of life? Voluntary palliated starvation
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die