Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Should people be assisted to die or be given euthanasia when they are suffering from terminal medical conditions? Should they be assisted to die when they are suffering but do not have a ‘diagnosable medical illness?’ What about assisted dying for psychiatric conditions? And is there a difference morally between assisted suicide, voluntary active euthanasia and voluntary passive euthanasia?
These are deep questions directly addressed or in the background of the productive discussion between Varelius and Young.1 ,2 Their focus is whether doctors should assist people to die who are ‘tired of life’ and experiencing ‘existential suffering’. An example was Edward Brongersma, an 86-year-old man, who was tired of life but with no serious medical condition, who was assisted by Dr Philip Sutorius to commit suicide in 1998. In the Netherlands, where euthanasia is legal, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that this was wrong because
(m)edical expertise, by its nature, does not extend to questions and complaints that do not have a sick- ness or ailment—mental or physical—as their source.3
Sutorius was convicted, but not punished.
Robert Young, considering this case, concurs, concluding,
a physician may justifiably consider that an individual who is ‘tired of life’ should consult a non-medical, professional counsellor, and if that produces no change in outlook, choose suicide. Outside Switzerland, an individual who makes that choice has to then be determined enough to do so unassisted (notwithstanding that the consequences for others may be distressing).2
I will argue that there is, within current medical ethics and human rights, a method of assisted suicide which could fall within the limits of the law. But first I will review some recent cases involving requests for dying. I will then discuss an alternative which some may argue addresses these cases, and those of …
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Law, ethics and medicine
- Law, ethics and medicine
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians ’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- On the relevance of an argument as regards the role of existential suffering in the end - of - life context
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts / omissions distinction in euthanasia
- Are general practitioners prepared to end life on request in a country where euthanasia is legalised
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Challenging accepted ethical beliefs
- Ethics briefings
- Terminal sedation: source of a restless ethical debate
- Widow of man who fought for right to die can continue his case
- Consent and end of life decisions