Article info
PDFViewpoint
Evolving legal responses to dependence on families in New Zealand and Singapore healthcare
- Correspondence to Tracey E Chan, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, 469G Bukit Timah Road, Eu Tong Sen Building, 259776, Singapore; lawchant{at}nus.edu.sg
Citation
Evolving legal responses to dependence on families in New Zealand and Singapore healthcare
Publication history
- Received November 7, 2012
- Revised June 24, 2013
- Accepted July 31, 2013
- First published August 20, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- The moral agency of institutions: effectively using expert nurses to support patient autonomy
- Ditching decision-making capacity
- Patient confidentiality and autonomy: how do we account for coercive control?
- Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
- Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform
- Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Advance directives and older people: ethical challenges in the promotion of advance directives in New Zealand