Healthcare decision-making has traditionally focused on individual autonomy, but there is now a change occurring in which the involvement of families is gaining prominence. This appears to stem from an increasing emphasis on relational aspects of autonomy which recognises the individual's connectedness to their family, and also state reliance upon families to share the burdens and costs of caring for elderly and disabled dependents. Such a reorientation calls for similar legal emphasis on patient autonomy as understood in relational terms, and one that offers more adequate conceptions of independence, confidentiality and decision-making authority in the light of this change. This paper outlines how two common law jurisdictions, New Zealand and Singapore, have accommodated, or are responding to, these changes.
- Bills, Laws and Cases
- Living Wills/Advance Directives
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- The moral agency of institutions: effectively using expert nurses to support patient autonomy
- Patient confidentiality and autonomy: how do we account for coercive control?
- Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
- Right to refuse treatment in Turkey: a diagnosis and a slightly less than modest proposal for reform
- Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Advance directives and older people: ethical challenges in the promotion of advance directives in New Zealand
- Informed consent in neurosurgery—translating ethical theory into action