Caesarean section (CS) is a method of delivering a baby through a surgical incision into the abdominal wall. Until recently in the UK, it was preserved as a procedure which was only carried out in certain circumstances. These included if the fetus lay in a breech position or was showing signs of distress leading to a requirement for rapid delivery. CS is perceived as a safe method of delivery due to the recommendation by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in these situations. As a result, the opportunity for maternal request for CS arose, whereby the mother requests the operation despite no medical indication. There are risks associated with CS, as with all surgery, however, these risks in current and future pregnancies may not be fully understood by the mother. The ethics of exposing mothers to these risks, as well as performing surgery on what is otherwise a healthy patient, become entangled with the demand for patient choice, as well as the increasing financial strain on our healthcare system. The main question to be examined in this essay is whether it is ethical to allow women to choose a CS in the absence of obstetric indication, taking into account the increased risk to the mother and her future offspring in order to potentially decrease the risk to the current baby. Alongside a case report, this analysis will apply Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of biomedical ethics and an exploration of the scientific literature.
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Clinical Ethics
- Maternal mortality
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study
- Risk factors and between-hospital variation of caesarean section in Denmark: a cohort study
- Analysis of caesarean section and neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural district hospital in Tanzania: an observational retrospective study
- Incidence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes for placenta accreta in Australia and New Zealand: a case–control study
- Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
- Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births
- Is a planned caesarean section in women with cardiac disease beneficial?
- Caesarean sections and the prevalence of preterm and early-term births in Brazil: secondary analyses of national birth registration
- Caesarean section in women with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: a population-based study
- The pathology of placenta accreta, a worldwide epidemic