Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Criminalising contagion
  1. Catherine Stanton
  1. Correspondence to Dr C Stanton, CSEP, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M3 9PL, UK; catherine.stanton{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

This special issue is the third in a series published by the BMJ Group.1 ,2 The papers published here arose from a call for papers linked to a project funded by the Economic and Social Research Council: ‘Criminalising Contagion: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Disease Transmission and the Criminal Law’, undertaken by David Gurnham, Hannah Quirk and myself. Since January 2013, we have held four seminars, which have brought together academics, healthcare professionals, representatives from charities, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Law Commission and the media. While the focus of these seminars was largely on the sexual transmission of disease (ie, HIV and herpes), the recent Ebola outbreak has highlighted the importance of addressing the broader questions as to whether, and if so when, the criminal law should be used in the context of disease transmission.3

The application of the criminal law to prosecute individuals for the transmission (and in some jurisdictions merely the exposure of another to the risk4) of sexually transmissible infections has been controversial. In England and Wales, successful prosecutions have …

View Full Text


  • Funding I gratefully acknowledge the support of the Economic and Social Research Council for funding the seminar series from which these papers arose (ES/J021555/1).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Other content recommended for you