In this paper I present an argument in favour of a parental duty to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). I argue that if embryos created in vitro were able to decide for themselves in a rational manner, they would sometimes choose PGD as a method of selection. Couples, therefore, should respect their hypothetical choices on a principle similar to that of patient autonomy. My thesis shows that no matter which moral doctrine couples subscribe to, they ought to conduct the PGD procedure in the situations when it is impossible to implant all of the created embryos and if there is a significant risk for giving birth to a child with a serious condition.
- Genetic Screening/Testing
- In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
- Reproductive Medicine
- Public Policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- An analysis of US fertility centre educational materials suggests that informed consent for preimplantation genetic diagnosis may be inadequate
- A situation of ethical limbo and preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- Preimplantation genetic testing
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice
- Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: medical and non-medical uses
- Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles