Article info
PDFPublic health ethics
Paper
Individual responsibility, solidarity and differentiation in healthcare
- Correspondence to Inge Stegeman, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (room J1b-210-1), Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, The Netherlands; i.stegeman{at}amc.nl
Citation
Individual responsibility, solidarity and differentiation in healthcare
Publication history
- Received January 28, 2013
- Revised August 9, 2013
- Accepted August 20, 2013
- First published September 11, 2013.
Online issue publication
October 20, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (11 September 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Nimble Approach: fast, adapting, calculating and ethically mindful approach to managing colorectal cancer screening programmes during a pandemic
- Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies
- Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review
- The value of models in informing resource allocation in colorectal cancer screening: the case of the Netherlands
- Performance of colorectal cancer screening in the European Union Member States: data from the second European screening report
- Piloting gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: population-based registry study from Finland
- Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative study
- An updated Asia Pacific Consensus Recommendations on colorectal cancer screening
- Joint Asian Pacific Association of Gastroenterology (APAGE)–Asian Pacific Society of Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE) clinical practice guidelines on the use of non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia
- Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy