The ethics of peer review in bioethics
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models
- Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial
- Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
- Journal editors’ perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
- Training patients to review scientific reports for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: an observational study
- What makes the best medical ethics journal? A North American perspective
- Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
- The peer review process: a primer for JNIS readers