Article Text
Abstract
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ 2011 report, Human Bodies: Donation for Medicine and Research, proposes a system for examining the ethical implications of different types of incentives for the provision of human tissue for use in medicine and research. The cornerstone of this system is the principle of altruism which, the Council recommends, should, where possible, remain the starting point for any such tissue provision. Using the Council's example of ova provision for research as an area in which altruism-based rewards might be departed from, this article argues that such a system has the potential to become inconsistent and unnecessarily complex. It suggests that the outcomes-focussed and motivations-focussed justifications the Council provides do not sit easily within the fast-paced and unpredictable area of biotechnology research. Further, it may undermine the focus on autonomy that is enshrined in the relevant legislation. This article suggests that a fair system for incentivising and rewarding the provision of human tissue in research should be developed, which focuses on elements of this role that are common to all tissue providers.
- Human Tissue
- Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
- Legal Aspects
- Scientific Research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- ‘ I have n’t met them, I do n’t have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown ’: a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research
- Keeping the scientists in step with society
- Ethics briefings
- Snakes and ladders: state interventions and the place of liberty in public health policy
- Ethics briefing
- The human body as property? Possession, control and commodification
- Plans to abolish bodies regulating fertility treatment and human tissues are discussed
- HFEA canvasses on whether to increase compensation to egg and sperm donors
- Contacting gamete donors to facilitate diagnostic genetic testing for the donor - conceived child: what are the rights and obligations of gamete donors in these cases? A response to Horton et al