Article Text
Abstract
This paper responds to an invitation by the editors to consider whether the intellectual property (IP) regime suggests an appropriate model for protecting interests in detached human body parts. It begins by outlining the extent of existing IP protection for body parts in Europe, and the relevant strengths and weaknesses of the patent system in that regard. It then considers two further species of IP right of less obvious relevance. The first are the statutory rights of ownership conferred by domestic UK law in respect of employee inventions, and the second are the economic and moral rights recognised by European and international law in respect of authorial works. In the argument made, both of these species of IP right may suggest more appropriate models of sui generis protection for detached human body parts than patent rights because of their capacity better to accommodate the relevant public and private interests in respect of the same.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Are pharmaceutical patents protected by human rights?
- Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries
- The COVID-19 vaccine patent: a right without rationale
- Should authorship on scientific publications be treated as a right?
- Patent wars: affordable medicines versus intellectual property rights
- Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine
- Containing diffusion: the tobacco industry’s multipronged trade strategy to block tobacco standardised packaging
- Global equitable access to vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for COVID-19: The role of patents as private governance
- Don’t worry about the drug industry’s profits when considering a waiver on covid-19 intellectual property rights
- Body parts in property theory: an integrated framework