The human body as property
The trespasses of property law
The purpose of this article is to identify a limit to the appropriate application of property law to the use and storage of bodily material. I argue here that property law ought to be limited to protecting ‘contingent rights’ and that recent cases where property rights have been recognised in semen represent the application of property law beyond this limit. I also suggest how the law ought to develop in order to avoid the overextensive use of property law.
- Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
- Human Tissue
- In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
- Legal Philosophy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The human body as property? Possession, control and commodification
- The current approach of the courts
- The argument for property rights in body parts: scarcity of resources
- Is the commercialisation of human tissue and body material forbidden in the countries of the European Union?
- Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives
- Organs as inheritable property?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Genetic testing without consent: the implications of the new Human Tissue Act 2004
- Interconnected, inhabited and insecure: why bodies should not be property
- Organoids as hybrids: ethical implications for the exchange of human tissues