Article info
PDFThe human body as property
Paper
The ownership that wasn't meant to be: Yearworth and property rights in human tissue
- Correspondence to Luke David Rostill, Wadham College, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PN, UK; luke.rostill{at}law.ox.ac.uk
Citation
The ownership that wasn't meant to be: Yearworth and property rights in human tissue
Publication history
- Received March 1, 2013
- Accepted March 14, 2013
- First published April 10, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Lost property? Legal compensation for destroyed sperm: a reflection and comparison drawing on UK and French perspectives
- The current approach of the courts
- The argument for property rights in body parts: scarcity of resources
- 'Advice, not orders’? The evolving legal status of clinical guidelines
- The trespasses of property law
- Body parts in property theory: an integrated framework
- The human body as property? Possession, control and commodification
- NICE head injury guidelines: review of the legal mandate
- Review of the complications and medicolegal implications of vasectomy
- The US Public Health Service “treating tobacco use and dependence clinical practice guidelines” as a legal standard of care