Share
PDFWithdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
Paper
Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- The right to die in the minimally conscious state
- A matter of life and death
- Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives
- Ethics briefings
- Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- How family caregivers' medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview study