Article info
Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
Paper
Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
- Correspondence to Dr Julian C Sheather, Ethics Department, British Medical Association, London WC1H 9JP, UK; jsheather{at}bma.org.uk
Citation
Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
Publication history
- Received March 12, 2012
- Accepted March 20, 2012
- First published May 17, 2012.
Online issue publication
August 19, 2013
Article Versions
- Previous version (17 May 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- The right to die in the minimally conscious state
- A matter of life and death
- Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives
- Ethics briefings
- Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state
- The weight attributed to patient values in determining best interests
- How family caregivers' medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview study