Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
Citation
Withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
Publication history
- First published August 19, 2013.
Online issue publication
August 19, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration from minimally conscious and vegetative patients: family perspectives
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- Court applications for withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a permanent vegetative state: family experiences
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- The minimally conscious state and treatment withdrawal: W v M
- Eluana Englaro, chronicle of a death foretold: ethical considerations on the recent right-to-die case in Italy
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions