Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Response
Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review
Abstract
Dyck and Allen's criticisms of current systems of governance are well founded, at least in some jurisdictions. Their desire to halt the expansion and intensification of research ethics governance is to be applauded. However, their listed categories of research to be exempted from mandatory review may not create a better system.
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Linked Articles
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The fraud squad
- Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
- The perils of peer review
- The ethics of peer review in bioethics
- Highlights in bioethics through 40 years: a quantitative analysis of top-cited journal articles
- Complex calculations: ethical issues in involving at-risk healthy individuals in dementia research
- Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis
- Ethics, human rights and HIV vaccine trials in low-income settings
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Thinking historically about public health