Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Response
Rolling back the bureaucracies of ethics review
Abstract
Dyck and Allen's criticisms of current systems of governance are well founded, at least in some jurisdictions. Their desire to halt the expansion and intensification of research ethics governance is to be applauded. However, their listed categories of research to be exempted from mandatory review may not create a better system.
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Linked Articles
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- Between universalism and relativism: a conceptual exploration of problems in formulating and applying international biomedical ethical guidelines
- Getting the justification for research ethics review right
- The fraud squad
- Ethical concerns regarding guidelines for the conduct of clinical research on children
- The standard of care debate: the Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion
- The battering of informed consent
- Response to Sheehan et al ’s ‘ In defence of governance: ethics review and social research ’
- Contesting the science / ethics distinction in the review of clinical research
- Diversity of scholarship in medical ethics