Article Text
PDFResearch ethics
Commentary
Commentary on ‘Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multiauthor article.’
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
- Research ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Honorary authorship epidemic in scholarly publications? How the current use of citation-based evaluative metrics make (pseudo)honorary authors from honest contributors of every multi-author article
- Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey
- Awareness, usage and perceptions of authorship guidelines: an international survey of biomedical authors
- Biomedical authors’ awareness of publication ethics: an international survey
- Bibliometric analysis of the top-cited gastroenterology and hepatology articles
- How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers
- Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?
- Authorship policies of scientific journals
- What can we learn from top-cited articles in inflammatory bowel disease? A bibliometric analysis and assessment of the level of evidence
- Top-cited articles in medical professionalism: a bibliometric analysis versus altmetric scores