The concise argument
Do we need research ethics committees?
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by ‘double effect’? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt
- The concise argument