Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Do we need research ethics committees?
- Correspondence to Dr Mark Sheehan, The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Rosemary Rue Building Headington, Oxford OX3 7LG; mark.sheehan{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Do we need research ethics committees?
Publication history
- First published July 16, 2013.
Online issue publication
July 16, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by ‘double effect’? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case
- Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study
- Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt
- The concise argument