Article info
PDFCurrent controversies
The child's right to an open future: is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision?
- Correspondence to Dr Robert J L Darby, Independent researcher, Curtin, ACT 2605, Australia; robertdarby{at}homemail.com.au
Citation
The child's right to an open future: is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision?
Publication history
- Received October 22, 2012
- Revised January 6, 2013
- Accepted January 8, 2013
- First published January 30, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- The limits of parental responsibility regarding medical treatment decisions
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors
- Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief
- #warriors: sick children, social media and the right to an open future