The principle of the child's right to an open future was first proposed by the legal philosopher Joel Feinberg and developed further by bioethicist Dena Davis. The principle holds that children possess a unique class of rights called rights in trust—rights that they cannot yet exercise, but which they will be able to exercise when they reach maturity. Parents should not, therefore, take actions that permanently foreclose on or pre-empt the future options of their children, but leave them the greatest possible scope for exercising personal life choices in adulthood. Davis particularly applies the principle to genetic counselling, arguing that parents should not take deliberate steps to create physically abnormal children, and to religion, arguing that while parents are entitled to bring their children up in accordance with their own values, they are not entitled to inflict physical or mental harm, neither by omission nor commission. In this paper, I aim to elucidate the open future principle, and consider whether it is applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision of boys, whether performed for cultural/religious or for prophylactic/health reasons. I argue that the principle is highly applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision, and conclude that non-therapeutic circumcision would be a violation of the child's right to an open future, and thus objectionable from both an ethical and a human rights perspective.
- Clinical Ethics
- Newborns and Minors
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- The limits of parental responsibility regarding medical treatment decisions
- The development of professional guidelines on the law and ethics of male circumcision
- The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors
- Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief
- #warriors: sick children, social media and the right to an open future