The American Academy of Pediatrics recently released a policy statement and technical report on circumcision, in both of which the organisation suggests that the health benefits conferred by the surgical removal of the foreskin in infancy definitively outweigh the risks and complications associated with the procedure. While these new documents do not positively recommend neonatal circumcision, they do paradoxically conclude that its purported benefits ‘justify access to this procedure for families who choose it,’ claiming that whenever and for whatever reason it is performed, it should be covered by government health insurance. The policy statement and technical report suffer from several troubling deficiencies, ultimately undermining their credibility. These deficiencies include the exclusion of important topics and discussions, an incomplete and apparently partisan excursion through the medical literature, improper analysis of the available information, poorly documented and often inaccurate presentation of relevant findings, and conclusions that are not supported by the evidence given.
- Informed Consent
- Newborns and Minors
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Current controversies
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- The ethics of infant male circumcision
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Benefits of newborn circumcision: is Europe ignoring medical evidence?
- The AAP Task Force on Neonatal Circumcision: a call for respectful dialogue