Circumcision, sexual dysfunction and the child's best interests: why the anatomical details matter
Other content recommended for you
- The surgical anatomy of the perineum
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
- Review of in situ and invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma and associated non-neoplastic dermatological conditions
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection?
- Circumcision in boys and girls: why the double standard?
- Detection of human papillomavirus in urine among heterosexual men in relation to location of genital warts and circumcision status
Jump to comment:
A recent Commentary piece by Lang1 contains a substantial historical error. He writes "Milah is merely a token clip of the very tip (the overhang flap or akroposthion) of the prepuce, which leaves most of the organ system (including all its essential functions) intact." No reference is cited, but the source appears to be Wallerstein2. Medical considerations make this unlikely,...
By Stephen Moreton Ph.D.
Whilst it is right and proper that the circumcision issue be debated, it is disturbing that many of those who oppose circumcision rely heavily upon selective literature citations, untested speculations about foreskin function, fear-mongering aimed at making circumcised males feel they have been sexually damaged, and denialism about the proven benefits of the procedure, while ignoring pub...