Article Text
Commentary
Circumcision, sexual dysfunction and the child's best interests: why the anatomical details matter
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
-
↵i Of course, it could be pointed out that the special issue to which Dr Mazor submitted his article was concerned with the ethics of infant male circumcision specifically; however, one wonders whether Dr Mazor has felt it relevant or motivating to draft additional articles for other journals concerning the permissibility of pre-emptively amputating body parts besides the prepuce.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Response
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The surgical anatomy of the perineum
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
- Review of in situ and invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma and associated non-neoplastic dermatological conditions
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection?
- Circumcision in boys and girls: why the double standard?
- Detection of human papillomavirus in urine among heterosexual men in relation to location of genital warts and circumcision status