Article info
PDFEditorials
The ethics of infant male circumcision
- Correspondence to Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; brian.earp{at}gmail.com
Citation
The ethics of infant male circumcision
Publication history
- Received April 5, 2013
- Accepted April 11, 2013
- First published June 18, 2013.
Online issue publication
June 18, 2013
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe 's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Out of step: fatal flaws in the latest AAP policy report on neonatal circumcision
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- Male or female genital cutting: why ‘ health benefits ’ are morally irrelevant
- On the impermissibility of infant male circumcision: a response to Mazor (2013)
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault
- Medical, religious and social reasons for and against an ancient rite